Thursday, June 28, 2012

The Benefits of Dessert Parties | Internet Contents

The two most common kinds of skin cancer are basal cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. (Carcinoma is cancer that begins in the cells that cover or line an organ.) Basal cell carcinoma accounts for more than 90 percent of all skin cancers in the United States. It is a slow-growing cancer that seldom spreads to other parts of the body.

Another type of cancer that occurs in the skin is melanoma, which begins in the melanocytes. Although anyone can get skin cancer, the risk is greatest for people who have fair skin that freckles easily?often those with red or blond hair and blue or light-colored eyes.

Ultraviolet (UV) radiation from the sun is the main cause of skin cancer. Artificial sources of UV radiation, such as sunlamps and tanning booths, can also cause skin cancer.

The risk of developing skin cancer is affected by where a person lives. People who live in areas that get high levels of UV radiation from the sun are more likely to get skin cancer. In the United States, for example, skin cancer is more common in Texas than it is in Minnesota, where the sun is not as strong. Worldwide, the highest rates of skin cancer are found in South Africa and Australia, areas that receive high amounts of UV radiation.

In addition, skin cancer is related to lifetime exposure to UV radiation. Most skin cancers appear after age 50, but the sun?s damaging effects begin at an early age. Therefore, protection should start in childhood to prevent skin cancer later in life

[Questions & Answers]

Q: When Do I need to protect myself from sun exposure?

A: Protection from sun exposure is important all year round, not just during the summer or at the beach. Any time the sun?s ultraviolet (UV) rays are able to reach the earth, you need to protect yourself from excessive sun exposure.

UV rays can cause skin damage during any season or temperature. Relatively speaking, the hours between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m. during daylight savings time (9 a.m. ? 3 p.m. during standard time) are the most hazardous for UV exposure in the continental United States. UV radiation is the greatest during the late spring and early summer in North America.

Remember: UV rays reach you on cloudy and hazy days, as well as on bright and sunny days. UV rays will also reflect off any surface like water, cement, sand, and snow.

Q: How can I protect myself from the sun?s UV rays?

A: When possible, avoid outdoor activities during midday, when the sun?s rays are strongest.This usually means the hours between 10 a.m. and 4 p.m.

You can also wear protective clothing,such as a wide-brimmed hat, long-sleeved shirt, and long pants.For eye protection, wear wraparound sunglasses that provide 100 percent UV ray protection. And always wear a broad-spectrum (protection against both UVA and UVB rays) sunscreen and lipscreen with at least SPF 15.

Remember to reapply as indicated by the manufacturer?s directions. Also, check the sunscreen?s expiration date. Sunscreen without an expiration date has a shelf life of no more than three years. Exposure to extreme temperatures can shorten the expiration date or shelf life of sunscreen.

Q: What does a suntan indicate? Why does the skin tan when exposed to the sun?

A: The penetration of UV rays to the skin?s inner layer results in the production of more melanin. That melanin eventually moves toward the outer layers of the skin and becomes visible as a tan.

A suntan is not an indicator of good health. Some physicians consider the skin?s tanning a response to injury because it appears after the sun?s UV rays have killed some cells and damaged others.

Q: Does it matter what kind of sunscreen I use?

A: Sunscreens come in a variety of forms such as lotions, gels, and sprays, so there are plentyof different options. There are also sunscreens made for specific purposes, such as the scalp, sensitive skin, and for use on babies. Regardless of the type of sunscreen you choose, be sure that you use one that blocks both UVA and UVB rays and that it offers at least SPF 15.

Q: What does a sunscreen?s SPF rating mean?

A: Sunscreens are assigned a Sun Protection Factor (SPF) number according to their effectiveness in offering protection from UV rays. Higher numbers indicate more protection. As a rule of thumb, you should always use a sunscreen with at least SPF 15.

Q: Do sunscreens need to be reapplied during the course of a day?

A: You should follow the manufacturer?s directions regarding reapplication or you risk not getting the protection that you might think you are getting. Though recently developed sunscreens are more resistant to loss through sweating and getting wet than previous sunscreens were, you should still reapply frequently, especially during peak sun hours or after swimming or sweating.

Q: What kinds of clothing best protect my skin from UV rays?

A: Clothing that covers your skin protects against the sun?s UV rays. Loose-fitting long-sleeved shirts and long pants made from tightly woven fabric offer the best protection. A wet t-shirt offers you much less UV protection than does a dry one.

If wearing this type of clothing isn?t practical, at least try to wear a t-shirt or a beach cover-up. Keep in mind, however, that a typical t-shirt actually has an SPF rating substantially lower than the recommended SPF 15, so double-up on protection by using sunscreen with at least SPF 15 (and UVA and UVB protection) and staying in the shade when you can.

Q: It gets so hot here in the summer, there?s no way I could be comfortable in long pants and along-sleeved shirt. So, what else can I do to protect my skin?

A: Protecting yourself from the sun?s UV rays doesn?t have to be a major chore; it?s just a matter of knowing your options and using them. Wearing a dry t-shirt is a good start, but it is not enough if you are going to be outside for more than a few minutes.

If you can?t wear long pants and a long-sleeved shirt, you can boost your protection by seeking shade whenever possible and by always wearing sunscreen with at least SPF 15.

Q: Will a hat help protect my skin? Are there recommended styles for the best protection?

A: Hats can help shield your skin from the sun?s UV rays. Choose a hat that provides shade for all of your head and neck. For the most protection, wear a hat with a brim all the way around that shades your face, ears, and the back of your neck.

If you choose to wear a baseball cap, you should also protect your ears and the back of your neck by wearing clothing that covers those areas, using sunscreen with at least SPF 15, or by staying in the shade. The amount of shade offered by a particular hat appears to be its most important prevention characteristic. If a darker hat is an option, though, it may offer even more UV protection.

Q: Are sunglasses an important part of my sun protection plan?

A: Yes. Sunglasses protect your eyes from UV rays and reduce the risk of cataracts. They also protect the tender skin around your eyes from sun exposure.

Q: What type of sunglasses best protects my eyes from UV rays?

A: Sunglasses that block both UVA and UVB rays offer the best protection. The majority of sunglasses sold in the United States, regardless of cost, meet this standard. Wrap-around sunglasses work best because they block UV rays from sneaking in from the side.

Q: Is there any particular time I should try to stay in the shade?

A: The sun?s UV rays are strongest and do the most damage during midday, so it?s best to avoid direct exposure between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. You can reduce your risk of skin damage and skin cancer by seeking shade under an umbrella, tree, or other shelter before you need relief from the sun.

Q: I work outdoors all summer and can?t stay in the shade. What can I do to protect my skin?

A: If you can?t avoid the sun, you can protect your skin by wearing a wide-brimmed hat, wraparound sunglasses that block both UVA and UVB rays, long-sleeved shirt, and long pants.

You can also wear a sunscreen and lipscreen with at least SPF 15 and UVA and UVB protection and reapply according to the manufacturer?s directions. When you can, take your breaks and your lunch in the shade.

Q: If I stay in the shade, should I still use sunscreen and wear a hat?

A: UV rays can reflect off virtually any surface (including sand, snow and concrete) and can reach you in the shade. Your best bet to protect your skin and lips is to use sunscreen or wear protective clothing when you?re outside ? even when you?re in the shade.

[Skin Self-Exam]

You can improve your chances of finding skin cancer promptly by performing a simple skin self-exam regularly.

The best time to do this self-exam is after a shower or bath. You should check your skin in a well-lighted room using a full-length mirror and a hand-held mirror. It?s best to begin by learning where your birthmarks, moles, and blemishes are and what they usually look like. Check for anything new?a change in the size, texture, or color of a mole, or a sore that does not heal. Check all areas, including the back, the scalp, between the buttocks, and the genital area.

1. Look at the front and back of your body in the mirror, then raise your arms and look at the left and right sides.

2.Bend your elbows and look carefully at your palms; forearms, including the undersides; and the upper arms.

3. Examine the back and front of your legs. Also look between your buttocks and around your genital area.

4. Sit and closely examine your feet, including the soles and the spaces between the toes.

5. Look at your face, neck, and scalp. You may want to use a comb or a blow dryer to move hair so that you can see better.

By checking your skin regularly, you will become familiar with what is normal. If you find anything unusual, see your doctor right away. Remember, the earlier skin cancer is found, the better the chance for cure.

Skin Cancer: Questions & Answers

Be one of the lucky few to gain access to little-known Natural Treatments that thousands have used to beat their cancer. Take charge of your health, the natural way! Click Here!

Content About : Skin Cancer: Questions & Answers Article

samuel adams snowy owl one for the money 10 minute trainer sarah burke death etta james funeral erin brockovich

Robotic quadrotors' training now complete, proven with razzle-dazzle Cannes show (video)

robotic-quadrotors-cannes-light-sound-show

We've watched our potential quad-mech overlords from KMel Robotics evolve from agile solo acrobats to worker bees to deft synchronized performers. It seemed only a matter of time before they would hunt down Sarah Connor en masse -- or take the show-biz world by storm. Fortunately for us, the tricky flyers chose to embrace their flamboyant side at a tour-de-force 16-quad lightshow in Cannes, where they opened the Saatchi & Saatchi New Directors' Showcase. The soaring automatons pulled all their past tricks out of the bag, flying precisely with mirrors to bounce lights from below, all timed to dramatic music --which they also had a hand in controlling. The sparkly treat awaits right after the break.

Continue reading Robotic quadrotors' training now complete, proven with razzle-dazzle Cannes show (video)

Robotic quadrotors' training now complete, proven with razzle-dazzle Cannes show (video) originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 27 Jun 2012 09:21:00 EDT. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

Permalink   |  sourceKMel Robotics  | Email this | Comments

white sox chuck colson ufc 145 results orrin hatch marlon byrd charles colson humber

Friday, June 22, 2012

Book review: Pet Care in the New Century ... - The Conscious Cat

Posted by Ingrid

Cutting_edge_medicine_for_cats

Advances in veterinary medicine make it possible to diagnose and?treat medical conditions in pets that would have been a death sentence a decade ago. From chemotherapy to kidney transplants, pets can now receive the same level of medical care as humans. Cutting-edge?veterinary care by board-certified specialists ranging from internists to oncologists to ophtamologists is becoming more widely available than ever before.

In Pet Care in the New Century: Cutting-Edge Medicine for Dogs and Cats, Amy Shojai provides a close up look at the amazing medical options for diagnosis and treatment of disease,?as well as the high level of preventive care available to cat guardians.

This comprehensive guide covers

  • the benefits of ultraound, CT scans, MRI?s and more
  • advances in drugs, surgery, and rehabilitation
  • molecular medicine, gene therapy, and genetics ethics
  • cost issues and pet insurance options
  • links to online resources and experts, including insights from more than 100 veterinary medicine specialists

The book contains an A-Z guide of 50 health and behavior conditions which outlines symptoms and treatment options (both conventional and holistic).

But this is not just a reference guide. Each section also includes a ?Modern Miracles? segment in which the author shares real life success stories from real life pet patients and guardians. Some of these stories will make your jaw drop, and others will bring tears to your eyes.

?My fondest wish is that?this book?will help you learn about various options to help you make the best choices for your individual animal?s circumstance,? says Shojai on the book?s Amazon page. ?Then it?s up to you to say ?yes? or ?no thanks? to a kidney transplant, paralysis cure, behavior help, or cancer treatments ? remembering always that there is no right or wrong answer.?

I couldn?t agree more. This book is a must have for every cat guardian. It will prove to be an invaluable guide, should you ever have to make a decision about advanced medical care for your cat.

Please note: If you?re going to purchase the print version of this book, click on the?plus sign next to ?Paperback, Bargain Price.? You?ll see the current, updated?edition in the drop down menu. The publisher is working with Amazon to correct this.

This book was given to me by the author. Receiving the complimentary copy did not influence my review.

2012_Pettie_Awards
Thank you for nominating us once a day ? each?time counts!?

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

pope joan paul pierce strawberry festival knicks strikeforce tate vs rousey ciaa lindsay lohan

Saturday, May 26, 2012

Everest climber skips summit, rescues friend

[ [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 2]], 'http://yhoo.it/KeQd0p', '[Slideshow: See photos taken on the way down]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['Connery is an experienced stuntman', 7]], ' http://yhoo.it/KpUoHO', '[Slideshow: Death-defying daredevils]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['know that we have confidence in', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/LqYjAX ', '[Related: The Secret Service guide to Cartagena]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['We picked up this other dog and', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JUSxvi', '[Related: 8 common dog fears, how to calm them]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 5]], 'http://bit.ly/JnoJYN', '[Related: Did WH share raid details with filmmakers?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['accused of running a fake hepatitis B', 3]], 'http://bit.ly/KoKiqJ', '[Factbox: AQAP, al-Qaeda in Yemen]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have my contacts on or glasses', 3]], 'http://abcn.ws/KTE5AZ', '[Related: Should the murder charge be dropped?]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 5]], 'http://yhoo.it/JD7nlD', '[Related: Bristol Palin reality show debuts June 19]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['have made this nation great as Sarah Palin', 1]], 'http://bit.ly/JRPFRO', '[Related: McCain adviser who vetted Palin weighs in on VP race]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['A JetBlue flight from New York to Las Vegas', 3]], 'http://yhoo.it/GV9zpj', '[Related: View photos of the JetBlue plane in Amarillo]', ' ', '630', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 15]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/white-house-stays-out-of-teen-s-killing-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120411/martinzimmermen.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['Titanic', 7]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/titanic-anniversary/', ' ', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/b/4e/b4e5ad9f00b5dfeeec2226d53e173569.jpeg', '550', ' ', ' ', ], [ [['He was in shock and still strapped to his seat', 6]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/navy-jet-crashes-in-virginia-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/cv/ip/ap/default/120406/jet_ap.jpg', '630', ' ', 'AP', ], [ [['xxxxxxxxxxxx', 11]], 'http://news.yahoo.com/photos/russian-grannies-win-bid-to-sing-at-eurovision-1331223625-slideshow/', 'Click image to see more photos', 'http://l.yimg.com/a/p/us/news/editorial/1/56/156d92f2760dcd3e75bcd649a8b85fcf.jpeg', '500', ' ', 'AP', ] ]

[ [ [['did not go as far his colleague', 8]], '29438204', '0' ], [ [[' the 28-year-old neighborhood watchman who shot and killed', 4]], '28924649', '0' ], [ [['because I know God protects me', 14], ['Brian Snow was at a nearby credit union', 5]], '28811216', '0' ], [ [['The state news agency RIA-Novosti quoted Rosaviatsiya', 6]], '28805461', '0' ], [ [['measure all but certain to fail in the face of bipartisan', 4]], '28771014', '0' ], [ [['matter what you do in this case', 5]], '28759848', '0' ], [ [['presume laws are constitutional', 7]], '28747556', '0' ], [ [['has destroyed 15 to 25 houses', 7]], '28744868', '0' ], [ [['short answer is yes', 7]], '28746030', '0' ], [ [['opportunity to tell the real story', 7]], '28731764', '0' ], [ [['entirely respectable way to put off the searing constitutional controversy', 7]], '28723797', '0' ], [ [['point of my campaign is that big ideas matter', 9]], '28712293', '0' ], [ [['As the standoff dragged into a second day', 7]], '28687424', '0' ], [ [['French police stepped up the search', 17]], '28667224', '0' ], [ [['Seeking to elevate his candidacy back to a general', 8]], '28660934', '0' ], [ [['The tragic story of Trayvon Martin', 4]], '28647343', '0' ], [ [['Karzai will get a chance soon to express', 8]], '28630306', '0' ], [ [['powerful storms stretching', 8]], '28493546', '0' ], [ [['basic norm that death is private', 6]], '28413590', '0' ], [ [['songwriter also saw a surge in sales for her debut album', 6]], '28413590', '1', 'Watch music videos from Whitney Houston ', 'on Yahoo! Music', 'http://music.yahoo.com' ], [ [['keyword', 99999999999999999999999]], 'videoID', '1', 'overwrite-pre-description', 'overwrite-link-string', 'overwrite-link-url' ] ]

atherosclerosis steven tyler tropic thunder carnie wilson missing reese witherspoon pregnant billy joel

Monday, May 21, 2012

Peter Alexander Meyers: Who Needs a Greek Government?

In Greece, coming in the next days and weeks are actions and decisions that will unleash the next fateful phase for Europe. The need for a new government is urgent.

This is not the first time. The country needed a new government in the fall of 2009. Why? To expose the free-for-all free-fall corruption under New Democracy. Then, despite himself, George Papandreou became a whistle-blower on a pan-European confidence game. All the corked-up demons of the Euro zone were called forth.

Once again last November the country needed a new government, for only the truly brave can move forward without coalitions and popular support. The failure of PASOK's leader to rise to this make-or-break moment for Europe bore its inevitable fruit: resignation and the illusion of a technocratic solution to a political problem. Papandreou's one brilliant stroke -- which was to call, as Thomas Jefferson would have, for popular judgment on his devil's pact with the European financial establishment -- was set aside when New Democracy's Antonis Samaras extorted him out of office and handed the reins to, of all things, a banker.

What appeared as cancellation was in fact only postponement of the Papandreou referendum. It was Lucas Papademos who eventually enabled that popular power. Following a second round of hair-raising negotiations with the "troika," that un-elected interim prime minister deemed his "key task" complete and proposed that "a new government, with a fresh popular mandate," should continue "the effort to reconstruct the economy."

What Papademos did not say, but what everyone knew, was that this time the need for a new government was not only in the offices of administration but in the streets of Athens. For better or for worse, the election of May 6 brought the people of Greece once again onto the stage of an increasingly global drama.

Indeed, in failing to produce a government that election again turned the need for one in a new direction. This turn has been largely misunderstood and, for that reason, it is again susceptible to machinations by the main actors. This both a gift to and risk for the purveyors of austerity like Angela Merkel; it is both nightmare and opportunity for the rising star of Greek politics, Alexis Tsipras.

These essential questions remain unanswered: To whom was the effort of May 6 a response? Who needs Greece to have a new government, and why? How does this need bear on the election now upcoming on June 17?

=Certainly the Greek state needs a government. Someone has to open and close the shop and stand behind the counter. Even when democracy becomes a limited liability corporation it needs a CEO.

The European polities, too, are calling forth a new government in Greece. That call is as diverse as the aspirations and the self-understanding of Greece's sixteen national partners. For this reason it is necessary, although difficult, to keep in mind that even "Germany is not Angela Merkel," as one Social Democrat politician put it after their stunning win against her this week in North Rhine-Westphalia.

The loudest demands from Europe, however, continue to issue from the financial establishment. They present a concise and exacting image of what a new Greek government would have to be. The key word for this -- disseminated across the board by major actors, from the "troika" to an astonishingly uncritical press -- is austerity. The authority of austerity, tuned as it is to the politically sterile clich?s of an Economics 101 textbook, is sustained by this repeated refrain: "The markets have spoken!"

This is an appeal to false necessity. It favors direct and indirect financial interests. What speaks here is the barely disguised voice of bankers and the most powerful investors. As translated through global capital markets, it is sheer nostalgia to say that what calls to us is the voice of Europe.

The global capital markets, too, need a new government in Greece. A cynic might see only this: The very demand for a government where one is not forthcoming is a strategy to calibrate further speculation -- foreplay for big downside bets. Beyond that, it is clear that markets trafficking in investment-grade public debt need government as insurance and hedge. You can call this "risk management," although it is also, perhaps more precisely, a kind of psychotherapy for bankers.

This demand from the markets for a new government in Greece rests on two foundations. One is the search for efficiency. The other is the desire for legitimacy. We shall see in a moment that in a situation like this both come down to the same thing.

Most people are not actually investors. Nonetheless, we are forced by curiosity or circumstances to think about investors. For us, their search for efficiency evokes a picture of a family farm or store balancing its books each month in an effort to eke out a slightly larger margin. Doesn't it go without saying that this requires the oversight of an authoritative executive? Who else would check spending? Collect revenues? Secure infrastructure? Police agreements?

For real investors, however, there is another and more fundamental aspect of the search for efficiency. It is about the maximization of profit. For bond investors, efficiency is a condition for payments on debt obligations. It is a factor in interest rates. In other words, the markets needed a new government because they want to get paid. Viewed this way, the issue of Europe rests on the assignment of political value to this economic fact.

The question again is why do state-bashing free-marketeers need Greece to have a government? The answer takes us into an unusually clear instance of what the brilliant economist Karl Polanyi called (in 1947) "our obsolete market mentality."

Within a single nation, capitalists may push hard to diminish state intervention in their particular zones of operation (and may do this even while free-riding on public investment). In the global economy, those same actors require and seek more stringent intervention by the states of foreign countries they target for investment.

Undoubtedly, weak foreign states can provide huge opportunities for capitalists. And it is easy to see "neo-liberalism" as nothing more than a drive for anomic "de-regulation" and disintegrative "privatization." But the fire-sale appropriation of publicaly capitalized enterprises with few protections for labor is only one side of the story.

The conjoined global and local circumstances of investment compel investors to also seek direct exercise of social control. The typical word for this today is austerity. In countries not their home, capitalists can, where it serves their interests, set a much higher threshold for state intervention in both the economy and the society within which that economy is inescapably embedded. This is what is behind the markets' demand for a government in Greece. Investors need the state to shore up their investment.

While a simple change of commodity prices can brutally punish ordinary people, the social control implicated in austerity must be undertaken by natural persons, actors who serve market interests. Firms do some of this, for example by constraining their employees. But to impose austerity measures on a whole population requires a bureaucracy, a legislature, the police, and many other institutions, sometimes even the army. The fact is that only local people and organizations can enforce the day to day controls on society that keep it in line with the imperatives of foreign investment.

At times, benefits for a population and benefits for foreign investors converge and social control is unnecessary. This is certainly not the case with Greece today. There is rather a growing divergence of interests. The Greek political class is being called upon to do things that insure global capital but do not directly benefit the Greek population. This is on its face a divergence from democracy. It appears on the domestic political scene with increasing clarity and has exacerbated its tensions.

Power brokers like German Chancellor Angela Merkel and European Central Bank President Mario Draghi are not exactly bluffing. But they operate to set the European agenda with a narrowly drawn and intimidating bluster. The representatives of austerity are playing a risky game and, as they finally begin to tip their hand, the next gambits now come into sharper view.

In just this last week the representatives of austerity (let's call them austeritites) have started to publicly urge Greece "to remain a member of the Euro zone." This increases a sort of leverage that just weeks ago no one thought Greece could have.

Until now, the whole world has been focused on the negative power of "exit." Everyone except Alexis Tsipras had overlooked the power of "voice" and the generative possibilities of intensified loyalty to Europe. As I wrote in my last post, it may be that refusing to leave the Euro will carry Greece much farther than any other option.

What changed this week is that now opposing voices are converging in the political topos of loyalty to Europe. No one should be surprised that this sharpens the divergence of interests.

When Chancellor Merkel says "remain a member of the Euro zone" she is both inviting Greece to stay and reasserting the austerity measures of the "memorandum." She is directing the public to and with the language of efficiency. But what counts in this historical moment is the intent and eventual effect of those same words. It is to inflect the outcome of the next round of elections that are now set for June 17.

In other words, German Chancellor Merkel has opened a pan-European political campaign to persuade Greek voters. The people of Greece are thus called to recognize as legitimate candidates who support austerity as it is defined by those who will not suffer under it. This is a classic attempt to transfer risk to the weak for the benefit of the powerful.

Although it may come too late to weigh in the balance, the tone even in Germany is changing. Interviewed by Justin Webb of the BBC World Service, Social Democrat politician J?rgen Acht (sp?) laid things out in these terms:

"I think that many people in our country think that it is not really very intelligent for the Greeks to sell all the infrastructure, it's not really intelligent to forget the policy of growing the economy, so we have to help the Greek people -- by the way, they have to save money, there's no question -- but just saving money is not the way we can go in the future of Europe."


Now, here is my main point in this long post. Contrary to what this shifting German opinion seems to imply, and contrary to what most politicians and pundits brazenly declare, the whole struggle being waged with Greece at its center pivots around the question of legitimacy and its sources. For, just as the political conflict over austerity is increasing, the global markets' demand for a new government in Greece cuts two ways. It involves a heightened need for legitimacy so that the state can insure global capital. At the same time, as the people of Greece are faced with declining incomes and the possibility of catastrophic economic collapse, the markets' need for a new government undercuts the legitimacy of, and to an as-of-yet-unknown extent the capacity of, the political actors willing to offer that insurance.

To see this as merely a trade-off between efficiency and legitimacy would be a huge mistake. Efficiency in all its modes is a process embedded in the social relationships. It, too, is contingent upon the legitimacy that allows social resources to be directed towards one end or another. Admittedly, the option here is not between austerity and growth, but between visions and versions of austerity. One is held by the corrupt and dishonored old guard of Greek politics -- New Democracy and Pasok. The other is being advanced by Tsipras and Syriza. For the people of Greece this is the difference between hope and despair.

Two facts control this entire scene: One is that markets cannot survive without states, the other is that capitalists and democrats will not always see eye to eye. It is at this crossroad that all the barbarians' demand for a new government collide with Greece's own need to govern itself.

When Papandreou's referendum was first announced in November, it was his intention to ask nothing more than this: "Do we want to adopt the new agreement? Or do we want to reject it?" Of course, he had his own reasons for putting it this way. In that strange winter it was easy to read this just one way: Greeks must decide to stay or go. Perhaps that is why it failed to come before the people. Perhaps that is why, when on May 6 the election was played out in a way that minimized the literal and more important question -- "Do you want to adopt the new agreement?" -- it failed again.

On May 6, New Democracy and Pasok foundered on their years of insult to legitimate government and Syriza sailed passed the capsized vessels of the traditional political elites. Before that, it was almost impossible to see that the issue confronting Europe today, the issue that continues to pester Europe because it is a condition for the survival of Europe, is not whether Greece should stay or go but a new struggle over the terms of agreements for mutual aid inside the union.

Alexis Tsipras was the first to state correctly this dilemma. This is what faces Greece today and it points towards the future of Europe. It was that insight that brought him forward in the first round of elections. That is how he has defined the stakes for June 17. That is why he is now gaining in the polls.

It has been said that Angela Merkel the austeritite created Tsipras. What we are seeing now is the chicken become the egg. To win in this critical moment Merkel has been compelled to follow the lead of her ardent adversary. Her strategy is to secure new legitimacy for the austerity package through intimidation. The first step in that direction is to strip the upcoming election of its broader significance. To do this, she has attempted to adopt the word referendum to her own purposes. By this she hopes to garner the residual authority of Papandreou's earlier proposition. As a consequence, she would have his referendum be remembered as what her referendum proposes: nothing more than an either/or decision on membership in the Euro.

No matter what Merkel does, however, it is the democratic election that is the true referendum. Only the election will provide, if anything can, a supportable mandate from which to go forward. It is still -- indeed, all the more -- the election that connects everyone to the dilemma actually facing the country. The leading edge of that dilemma is, on its face, and in the spirit of European loyalty, whether or not to renegotiate the "memorandum."

For, however this works out for Greece, revisiting the "memorandum" will entail nothing less than a renegotiation of what Europe -- all seventeen members and the spirit that joins them -- must mean if it is to survive. To this point, only Tsipras has had the courage to call a spade a spade, and to offer for serious debate in the expanded European agora a path between capitulation and collective suicide.

'); jQuery('#c_text_1530').append(""); if (Campaign_1530.campaign_info.campaign.picture_url !=null && Campaign_1530.campaign_info.campaign.picture_url !=""){ jQuery('#moment_right_1530').append(""); }else{ jQuery('#moment_right_1530').append(""); } jQuery('#moment_right_1530').append(""); jQuery('#c_text_1530').append(""); jQuery('#moment_left_1530').append('

'+Campaign_1530.campaign_info.campaign.campaign_name+'

'); jQuery('#campaign_name_1530').addClass('moment_campaign_title'); jQuery('#moment_left_1530').append('

'+Campaign_1530.campaign_info.campaign.about_text+'

'); jQuery('#campaign_text_1530').addClass('m_campaign_text'); }, otb_design:function(data){ jQuery('#campaign_participate_btn_container_1530').remove(); jQuery('#campaign_name_1530').addClass('otb_campaign_title'); jQuery('#campaign_text_1530').addClass('otb_campaign_text'); jQuery('#campaign_1530').addClass('otb_campaign_container'); jQuery('#campaign_title_container_1530').append(""); jQuery('#campaign_title_container_1530').append(" "); jQuery('#campaign_title_container_1530').append(""); }, defaul_design:function(){ jQuery('#campaign_name_1530').addClass('campaign_title'); jQuery('#campaign_title_1530').html(Campaign_1530.campaign_info.campaign.campaign_title); jQuery('#campaign_bottom_1530').remove(); jQuery('#campaign_1530').addClass('campaign_container'); }, CampaignLogin : function(){ HuffConnect.Login.onLoginSuccess = function() { window.location.hash = 'join_campaign'; window.location.reload(); } if (Campaign_1530.campaign_info.campaign.style ==2){ window.location.hash = 'join_campaign'; window.location.reload(); }else{ QuickLogin.pop(); } }, CampaignJoin : function (join_control, campaign_id) { join_control.style.display = 'none'; jQuery('#btn_take_part_in_survey_1530').css("display", ''); jQuery('#campaign_name_1530').html(Campaign_1530.campaign_info.campaign.thank_you_email_subject); jQuery('#campaign_text_1530').html(Campaign_1530.campaign_info.campaign.thank_you_email_body); Campaign_1530.CallPostJoinAction(); }, GetFormFail:function(){ alert('Sorry, unable to procees your request'); HuffConnect.hideModal(); }, CallPostJoinAction:function(){ jQuery.ajax({ url: Campaign_1530.post_join_actions_url , success: function(data){ huff.use('modal', function(m){ m.show({ content: data, width: 750, height: 550 }) }); //HPUtil.EvalScript(data); } , cache: false }); } };

enemy of the state golden globe nominees joe philbin miss america pageant 2012 shipwreck jose aldo vs chad mendes lana del rey